Reaction to fire and fury book
Michael Wolff on ‘Very Angry’ Trump, ‘Surreal’ Book Release – Rolling StoneChat with us in Facebook Messenger. Find out what's happening in the world as it unfolds. More Videos How did Wolff pull 'Fire and Fury' off? Trump may have lost key ally in conservative media.
Full of Fire and Fury, Signifying Nothing
M ichael Wolff is back and not with a whimper. The latest installment of his Trump chronicles picks up where Fire and Fury ended. Once again, it leaves the president bruised and readers shaking their heads. None escape unscathed. Steve Bannon supplies a running commentary for which Wolff calls him his Virgil. Much weirder.
President Donald Trump and the staff of his presidential campaign and White House. The title refers to a quote by Trump about the conflict with North Korea. The book became a New York Times number one bestseller. Reviewers generally accepted Wolff's portrait of a dysfunctional Trump administration, but were skeptical of many of Wolff's particular claims. The book highlights descriptions of Trump's behavior, chaotic interactions among senior White House staff, and derogatory comments about the Trump family by former White House Chief Strategist Steve Bannon. According to Michael Wolff , when he approached Donald Trump about writing a book on his presidency , Trump agreed to give him access to the White House because he liked an article Wolff wrote about him in June for The Hollywood Reporter. Starting in mid, Wolff interviewed campaign and transition staff.
Here we go again: another juicy book about the White House, early leaks, a round of flat denials, shortly to be followed—in all likelihood—by a set of fevered interpretations and recriminations. The book is Siege , by Michael Wolff. But the bigger problem is the format. What more can we learn about a president who is already so heavily exposed? Once upon a time, the tell-all would actually tell something new about a president. The former George W. Articles and books like these offered both new detail and new interpretation that could help the public understand leaders and perhaps change public opinion about them.